No published hash for the consistent secure setting but it exists on the local node – How to solve this OpenSearch error

Opster Team

Aug-23, Version: 1-1.1

Before you dig into reading this guide, have you tried asking OpsGPT what this log means? You’ll receive a customized analysis of your log.

Try OpsGPT now for step-by-step guidance and tailored insights into your OpenSearch operation.

Briefly, this error occurs when there’s a mismatch between the secure settings on the local node and the cluster-wide settings. This could be due to an incorrect or missing setting on the local node. To resolve this issue, you can try the following: 1) Verify and ensure that the secure settings are correctly configured on all nodes. 2) If the settings are correct, try restarting the node to refresh the settings. 3) If the error persists, you may need to remove and re-add the node to the cluster to ensure it has the correct settings.

For a complete solution to your to your search operation, try for free AutoOps for Elasticsearch & OpenSearch . With AutoOps and Opster’s proactive support, you don’t have to worry about your search operation – we take charge of it. Get improved performance & stability with less hardware.

This guide will help you check for common problems that cause the log ” no published hash for the consistent secure setting [{}] but it exists on the local node ” to appear. To understand the issues related to this log, read the explanation below about the following OpenSearch concepts: node, settings.

Log Context

Log “no published hash for the consistent secure setting [{}] but it exists on the local node” classname is ConsistentSettingsService.java.
We extracted the following from OpenSearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :

                // consistency of missing
                logger.debug("no published hash for the consistent secure setting [{}] but it also does NOT exist on the local node";
                        concreteSecureSetting.getKey());
            } else if (publishedSaltAndHash == null && localHash != null) {
                // setting missing on master but present locally
                logger.warn("no published hash for the consistent secure setting [{}] but it exists on the local node";
                        concreteSecureSetting.getKey());
                if (state.nodes().isLocalNodeElectedMaster()) {
                    throw new IllegalStateException("Master node cannot validate consistent setting. No published hash for ["
                            + concreteSecureSetting.getKey() + "] but setting exists.");
                }

 

How helpful was this guide?

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Get expert answers on Elasticsearch/OpenSearch