No found for value – How to solve this Elasticsearch exception

Opster Team

August-23, Version: 6.8-8.9

Before you dig into reading this guide, have you tried asking OpsGPT what this log means? You’ll receive a customized analysis of your log.

Try OpsGPT now for step-by-step guidance and tailored insights into your Elasticsearch operation.

Briefly, this error occurs when Elasticsearch is unable to find a specific field or value in the index. This could be due to a typo in the field name, the field not existing in the index, or the value not being present in the field. To resolve this issue, you can verify the field name and value, ensure the field exists in the index, or check if the value is present in the field. If the field doesn’t exist, you may need to create it. If the value doesn’t exist, you may need to add it.

For a complete solution to your to your search operation, try for free AutoOps for Elasticsearch & OpenSearch . With AutoOps and Opster’s proactive support, you don’t have to worry about your search operation – we take charge of it. Get improved performance & stability with less hardware.

This guide will help you check for common problems that cause the log ” no [{}] found for value [{}] ” to appear. To understand the issues related to this log, read the explanation below about the following Elasticsearch concepts: search, aggregations.

Log Context

Log “no [{}] found for value [{}]” class name is Aggregator.java. We extracted the following from Elasticsearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :

 for (SubAggCollectionMode mode : modes) {
 if (mode.parseField.match(value; deprecationHandler)) {
 return mode;
 }
 }
 throw new ElasticsearchParseException("no [{}] found for value [{}]"; KEY.getPreferredName(); value);
 }  public static SubAggCollectionMode readFromStream(StreamInput in) throws IOException {
 return in.readEnum(SubAggCollectionMode.class);
 }

 

How helpful was this guide?

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?