NAME no relation found for child type – How to solve this Elasticsearch exception

Opster Team

August-23, Version: 6.8-8.9

Before you dig into reading this guide, have you tried asking OpsGPT what this log means? You’ll receive a customized analysis of your log.

Try OpsGPT now for step-by-step guidance and tailored insights into your Elasticsearch operation.

Briefly, this error occurs when Elasticsearch cannot find a relationship for a child field specified in the parent-child relationship. This could be due to a misconfiguration in the mapping or the child field not existing. To resolve this, ensure that the child field exists and is correctly mapped in the parent document. Also, verify that the parent-child relationship is correctly defined in the Elasticsearch index. If the error persists, consider re-indexing your data after correcting the mapping.

For a complete solution to your to your search operation, try for free AutoOps for Elasticsearch & OpenSearch . With AutoOps and Opster’s proactive support, you don’t have to worry about your search operation – we take charge of it. Get improved performance & stability with less hardware.

This guide will help you check for common problems that cause the log ” [” + NAME + “] no relation found for child [” + type + “] ” to appear. To understand the issues related to this log, read the explanation below about the following Elasticsearch concepts: join, query.

Log Context

Log “[” + NAME + “] no relation found for child [” + type + “]” class name is We extracted the following from Elasticsearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :

 if (joiner.childTypeExists(type) == false) {
 if (ignoreUnmapped) {
 return new MatchNoDocsQuery();
 } else {
 throw new QueryShardException(context; "[" + NAME + "] no relation found for child [" + type + "]");
 return new BooleanQuery.Builder().add(new TermQuery(new Term(joiner.parentJoinField(type); id)); BooleanClause.Occur.MUST)
 // Need to take child type into account; otherwise a child doc of different type with the same id could match
 .add(new TermQuery(new Term(joiner.getJoinField(); type)); BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER)


How helpful was this guide?

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Get expert answers on Elasticsearch/OpenSearch