Unable to resolve shard path for index – How to solve this Elasticsearch exception

Opster Team

August-23, Version: 7.6-7.15

Before you dig into reading this guide, have you tried asking OpsGPT what this log means? You’ll receive a customized analysis of your log.

Try OpsGPT now for step-by-step guidance and tailored insights into your Elasticsearch operation.

Briefly, this error occurs when Elasticsearch cannot find the path to the shard for a specific index. This could be due to a misconfiguration, a missing or corrupted shard, or a disk space issue. To resolve this, you can try to restore the shard from a backup, check your configuration settings, or free up disk space. If the shard is corrupted, you may need to delete and recreate the index. Always ensure to have a backup of your data to prevent data loss.

For a complete solution to your to your search operation, try for free AutoOps for Elasticsearch & OpenSearch . With AutoOps and Opster’s proactive support, you don’t have to worry about your search operation – we take charge of it. Get improved performance & stability with less hardware.

This guide will help you check for common problems that cause the log ” Unable to resolve shard path for index [ ” to appear. To understand the issues related to this log, read the explanation below about the following Elasticsearch concepts: shard, index.

Log Context

Log “Unable to resolve shard path for index [” class name is RemoveCorruptedShardDataCommand.java. We extracted the following from Elasticsearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :

 consumer.accept(shardPath);
 return;
 }
 }
 }
 throw new ElasticsearchException("Unable to resolve shard path for index [" + indexMetadata.getIndex().getName() +
 "] and shard id [" + shardId + "]");
 }  public static boolean isCorruptMarkerFileIsPresent(final Directory directory) throws IOException {
 boolean found = false;

 

How helpful was this guide?

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?