Failed to parse seasonality type accepted values are – How to solve this Elasticsearch exception

Opster Team

August-23, Version: 6.8-7.17

Before you dig into reading this guide, have you tried asking OpsGPT what this log means? You’ll receive a customized analysis of your log.

Try OpsGPT now for step-by-step guidance and tailored insights into your Elasticsearch operation.

Briefly, this error occurs when Elasticsearch is unable to parse the seasonality type provided in the request. The seasonality type is likely missing, incorrect, or not supported. To resolve this issue, ensure that the seasonality type is correctly specified in the request. Check the Elasticsearch documentation for the accepted values and use one of those. If the error persists, there might be a problem with the Elasticsearch version you’re using, so consider updating it.

For a complete solution to your to your search operation, try for free AutoOps for Elasticsearch & OpenSearch . With AutoOps and Opster’s proactive support, you don’t have to worry about your search operation – we take charge of it. Get improved performance & stability with less hardware.

This guide will help you check for common problems that cause the log ” failed to parse seasonality type [{}]. accepted values are [{}] ” to appear. To understand the issues related to this log, read the explanation below about the following Elasticsearch concepts: aggregations, search.

Log Context

Log “failed to parse seasonality type [{}]. accepted values are [{}]” class name is We extracted the following from Elasticsearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :

 if (result == null) {
 final List validNames = new ArrayList<>();
 for (SeasonalityType policy : values()) {
 throw new ElasticsearchParseException("failed to parse seasonality type [{}]. accepted values are [{}]"; text; validNames);
 return result;
 }  private final byte id;


How helpful was this guide?

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?